For CEOs, CTOs, CIOs and CFOs
Your team already runs tools built with AI, and today the people who built them are the ones reviewing them. We do the independent review of the whole system. You get one page with what holds up, what doesn't and where to start.
30 minutes. Scope and timeline in writing before we start. Read-only access. More than 1,200 known review points.
That is why Sondeon's expert review is an automated AI tool, supervised by people. AI has a lot of data; the knowledge belongs to people, and they are the ones who verify, direct and review the systems.
More than 1,200 known review points
They include the points where AI makes mistakes or does not code correctly.
Code, architecture, data, server and monitoring, in a single engagement. Many flaws only show up where two of those pieces meet.
“Shadow AI” is talked about as data leaving the company. The other half is what your people have already built with AI and is running today.
For CTOs and CIOs
Apps, websites, backend (the part the user never sees), databases and agents that are already running or about to ship. We tell you what state they are in.
For data leaders, CIOs and CFOs
Licenses paid for and never used, and data that breaks silently, in Salesforce, Microsoft Fabric, Databricks, Power BI and Microsoft 365. We don't sell licenses.
For marketing and digital leaders
Speed, accessibility and visibility in Google and in AI assistants, measured on the page your customer sees. It is what we do with our own websites.
30 minutes. Scope and timeline in writing before we start. Read-only access.
urankin.com and dopplos.com are our own websites. These are their Google PageSpeed Insights reports after we reviewed them with the same method we apply to yours. The sondeon.com home page renders in 0.8 s on a phone with a slow connection; the median of twelve websites in our sector, measured the same day, is 3.6 s.
Google PageSpeed Insights
Google PageSpeed Insights
The scores under each image are copied from the report. The sector comparison is a single measurement per website, taken on October 10, 2026.
The first review covers one system: the one about to go to production or the one that worries you most. Scope and timeline are fixed in writing before we start.
Reviewed end to end: code, architecture, data, server and monitoring. You get its state on one page and the list of what to fix first.
If you want to go on, the 360 review: the same method and the same report for each system, and a single page for leadership.
Your systems change every week. The review is repeated every three months and compared with the previous one: you see what was closed and what is new.
You move to the next step only if you want to.
The sample report shows what you receive. The checklist lets you see for yourself whether what your team has built with AI is ready for production.
One picture with the state of all your systems: code, data, server and platforms.
Leadership gets one page with the state and what to do first. The technical detail comes behind it, for your team.
We don't sell licenses and have no commercial relationship with any vendor. What we say about your platforms does not depend on what we could sell you.
Your systems change every week. We recommend repeating the review every three months: we compare it with the previous one and show you what changed.
Scope and timeline are in writing before we start. The fix is separate, and only if you ask.
We look at what you have and what to review first.
You get in writing what is reviewed, what is left out and when it is delivered. You give us read-only access.
An automated AI tool goes through the review points and senior developers verify every finding before it goes into the report.
Every finding with its evidence and its priority, explained to your team, and one page for leadership.
One report for two readers: one page for leadership and the detail with evidence for your team.
For each system reviewed: code, apps, website, backend, databases, server and platforms.
With the evidence of where it is and why it matters.
What to fix first, what can wait and what doesn't matter.
We walk your team through it, and leadership gets a one-page summary.
The one-page summary, for leadership
Status: good on what was measured, with four findings: 2 closed in this version and 2 open
Figures measured on October 11, 2026. The Lighthouse ones are lab figures on a simulated mobile device, not data from real visits.
Four findings, as they arrive, with their status
The privacy policy is published with details still missing
PriorityHigh
StatusOpen Counted in this review on the published page: the text appears 10 times.
The button says “Book a free meeting” and offers no day or time to pick
PriorityMedium
StatusOpen Read in this review on the live home page: the button leads to “#solicitar”, the form is submitted with “Request the free meeting” and it has no field for a day or a time.
All three are useful, each for one thing. AI brings the volume and people bring the judgment: that is why our review uses an automated AI tool and senior developers supervise it.
| What we compare | The AI itself | Automated tool | Sondeon review |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it looks at | The code you show it | The code in one repository, change by change | The whole system: code, data, server and platforms |
| When | Instantly, while the code is being written | On every change, without anyone asking | Before you depend on the system and, after that, every three months |
| What it does well | It is fast and cheap | It is consistent with known flaws | People who verify every finding and discard the false ones |
| What it delivers | Suggestions on that code | A list of warnings | The state of each system and what to fix first |
| Who it is for | Whoever writes the code | The technical team | Leadership and the technical team |
The review is done by a team of senior developers, with many hours of development and of finding the mistakes AI makes when it codes. We know more than 1,200 review points. The automated AI tool goes through them, and people verify, direct and review.
Team of senior developers
José María Salido, founder of Sondeon, answers for it
An IT audit is an independent review of a company's systems to find out what state they are in. Sondeon runs it as a periodic health check: a 360 review of what your company has built with AI, of its data platforms and of its website, repeated every three months to see what changed.
They differ by what they look at: security, compliance with a standard, systems or code. If your company has built software with AI, the first step is knowing what state all of it is in. That is our health check, which covers code, data, server and platforms in a single review.
Sondeon. We review what your team has built with tools like Cursor, Claude Code or Copilot: apps, websites, backend, databases and server. You get each finding with its evidence and the list ranked by impact, before your company depends on it.
For our health check, it depends on which systems need reviewing and how large they are. We go over it in a 30-minute meeting, and then you get the scope and timeline in writing before we start.
Yes. The 30-minute meeting is free. After that you get the scope and the timeline in writing, before we start.
Because it changes who decides. A tool and the AI itself review the code of one piece, quickly and on every change. Our review also uses an automated AI tool, and a team of senior developers supervises it: they verify every finding, look at the whole system and tell leadership what to fix first.
The health status of each system reviewed, each finding with its evidence, the list ranked by impact, a meeting with your team and a one-page summary for leadership.
Yes, if you ask us to. Your team can also do it, with the list and the evidence in hand, or another provider can. The fix is separate from the review and only happens if you request it.
Read-only access to the systems listed in the scope. The review looks and measures: we change nothing in production without your approval.
Sondeon is an independent expert review service for what a company has built with AI, its data platforms and its website. It is for whoever answers for it: the CEO, CTO, CIO, CFO or head of data. We are not a partner of any vendor and we don't sell licenses.
Updated on
Fill in the form and we email you to set a day and a time. It is 30 minutes, and after that you get the scope and timeline in writing.
Not the right time yet? Look at the sample report, go through the checklist or read the guides.